NGS Assays: Here are the Variables of Clinical Performance

By Senior Medical Device/Regulatory Analysts

Share this article!

“FDA’s vision is that NGS-based tests can be developed, validated, and offered for clinical use through a process that leverages appropriate standards, quality systems controls and community assessment of clinical validity to streamline the premarket review process.” [1]

Since the early 2000s next-generation sequencing (NGS) has become an invaluable tool in both drug discovery research and clinical/diagnostic settings for disease-specific precision medicine.  Whole genome sequencing (WGS) and whole exome sequencing (WES) are two NGS methods with clinical implications. Clinically, WGS sequences the human genome in clinical samples to determine the roles of genes in disease development. According to Hendriksen et al., WGS is currently used to monitor antimicrobial resistance globally. [2] Targeted sequencing of the protein coding exons of genes makes WES useful for the genetic diagnosing of diseases such as with specific cancer types. [3]

Establishing the clinical validity of next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays is a unique burden in comparison to the requirements for non-genomic in vitro diagnostic devices (IVDs). Per the notifying body, TUV SUD, a clinical performance report must provide evidence for usefulness of the analyte(s) or marker(s) of a device. [4] Because NGS devices are capable of measuring millions of genomic analytes related to numerous conditions, clinical performance reports (CPRs), which must painstakingly delineate diagnostic specificity and sensitivity for every prescribed intended use of an assay, can easily become tedious to develop. In comparison, a non-genomic IVD CPR is written to provide evidence for a limited number of analytes, usually one or two.

A second caveat and distinct feature of NGS assay testing is that a single genomic variant may either hinder or promote disease progression depending upon the region of pathology. For instance, programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) genes are understood to prevent cancer cell death by inhibiting T lymphocyte activation in malignant cells. [5] To prolong the survival of cancer patients, a class of immunotherapy known as PD-L1 inhibitors are often prescribed concomitant with chemotherapy.

Validating the clinical performance of a PD-L1 assay will likely generate PD-L1 inhibitor trials which will demonstrate equal success in prolonging progression-free survival in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer patients [6] and failure to do the same in recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [7]. This duality in clinical performance is inherent to NGS assay testing and still proves the usefulness of the assay for monitoring progression of both lung and head and neck cancers.

Clinical Study Literature Review for NGS Assays

When evaluating test performance, incorporating the following parameters into the literature search protocol should provide the most comprehensive results.

Allow Nerac to help you obtain a CE mark for your NGS Assays.

How Can Nerac Help?

Complying with the new IVDR requirements may seem like a daunting task, particularly for manufacturers who could previously self-certify, but partnering with Nerac can help you navigate the process and successfully achieve compliance.  Nerac has a knowledgeable team of analysts/medical writers with expertise in clinical literature searches and targeted literature reviews to support regulatory submissions.  The Nerac team assists IVD manufacturers with identifying and analyzing clinical data from the literature as it pertains to state of the art, scientific validity, and device performance, using an approach that has been refined over many years supporting manufacturers with EU medical device submissions. Call us at 860.872.7000 or contact us here to learn more!

References

  1. Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Considerations for Design, Development, and Analytical Validation of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) – Based In Vitro Diagnostics (IVDs) Intended to Aid in the Diagnosis of Suspected Germline Diseases. FDA; [cited 2023 Aug 14]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/considerations-design-development-and-analytical-validation-next-generation-sequencing-ngs-based
  2. Hendriksen RS, Bortolaia V, Tate H, Tyson GH, Aarestrup FM, McDermott PF. Using genomics to track global antimicrobial resistance. Frontiers in Public Health. 2019;7. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2019.00242
  3. Hartman P, Beckman K, Silverstein K, Yohe S, Schomaker M, Henzler C, et al. Next generation sequencing for clinical diagnostics: Five Year experience of an academic laboratory. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism Reports. 2019;19:100464. doi:10.1016/j.ymgmr.2019.100464
  4. Annex XIII: Performance evaluation, performance studies and post-market performance follow-up [Internet]. TÜV SÜD Akademie GmbH; [cited 2023 Aug 16]. Available from: https://de-mdr-ivdr.tuvsud.com/Annex-XIII-Performance-evaluation-performance-studies-and-post-market-performance-follow-up.html
  5. Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.; 2018 [cited 2023 Aug 13]. Available from: https://www.cellsignal.com/pathways/immune-checkpoint-signaling-pathway
  6. Yu H, Chen P, Cai X, Chen C, Zhang X, He L, et al. Efficacy and safety of PD-L1 inhibitors versus PD-1 inhibitors in first-line treatment with chemotherapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy. 2021;71(3):637–44. doi:10.1007/s00262-021-03017-z.
  7. Saâda-Bouzid E, Defaucheux C, Karabajakian A, Coloma VP, Servois V, Paoletti X, et al. Hyperprogression during anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Annals of Oncology. 2017;28(7):1605–11. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx178
  8. Center for Devices and Radiological Health. In vitro diagnostics [Internet]. FDA; [cited 2023 Aug 16]. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/products-and-medical-procedures/in-vitro-diagnostics.
  9. Mandelker D, Schmidt RJ, Ankala A, McDonald Gibson K, Bowser M, Sharma H, et al. Navigating highly homologous genes in a molecular diagnostic setting: A resource for clinical next-generation sequencing. Genetics in Medicine. 2016;18(12):1282–9. doi:10.1038/gim.2016.58
  10. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Regulating medical devices in the UK [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Aug 16]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/regulating-medical-devices-in-the-uk.
  11. Cramer G. Regulatory and development approaches to research for in vitro diagnostics vs. other medical devices-the same or different? [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 Aug 16]. Available from: https://www.acrpnet.org/2023/02/22/regulatory-and-development-approaches-to-research-for-in-vitro-diagnostics-vs-other-medical-devices-the-same-or-different/
  12. Aouacheria A, Navratil V, López-Pérez R, Gutiérrez NC, Churkin A, Barash D, et al. In silico whole-genome screening for cancer-related single-nucleotide polymorphisms located in human mrna untranslated regions. BMC Genomics. 2007;8(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2164-8-2.

Get Our Newsletter

Sign up for monthly digest articles to keep up to date with Nerac

Select Your Area(s) of Interest *

Topics of Interest

you might also like